The presents weren't stacked neatly beneath a tree bedazzled with lights and tinsel. They were delivered as a single line of type, crawling across the bottom of the television screen on ESPN shortly after Tiger Woods celebrated his epic U.S. Open victory at Torrey Pines. But the celebration was just as merry among the Tar Heel faithful.
Even the most optimistic among them probably never considered it realistic to hope that Wayne Ellington, Danny Green and Ty Lawson would all withdraw their names from the NBA draft and return to school for next season. In fact, there seemed more of a chance that all three would leave than stay.
In the end, Ellington listened to the multitude of informed voices who warned that there are still too many holes in his game to be a first-round pick and Lawson decided to play it safe rather than risk going into the draft as damaged goods after a recent drunk-driving arrest and numerous injuries. As for Green, he and his cash-strapped family finally came to the realization that you can't pay off many bills on the $20,000 a year or so they pay for playing in the NBA's D-League.
Barring injury or other unforeseen circumstance, all three should greatly enhance their pro prospects (and pay checks) by playing one more season of college ball. Then again, Ellington, Lawson and Green might have been just as swayed by the experiences of Tar Heel teammates Tyler Hansbrough and Bobby Frasor back on campus. Those guys seemed to be having a lot more fun "testing the waters," so why not come back and join them -- especially if a national championship ring is included in the deal?
Though the reasons behind their individual decisions might never be known, the repercussions are as tangible as the banners hanging from the Smith Center rafters. As of Monday afternoon at 5 p.m., UNC is officially the team to beat in college basketball for 2008-09.
There can be no argument that the Tar Heels will be the most talented, experienced and motivated team in the country next fall. But their march to the national championship, let alone the Four Four in Detroit, is anything but inevitible.
For one thing, despite the return of so many starters, the chemistry of next year's team will be drastically different than it was during last spring's impressive stretch run. Frasor will be back from his injury and will want playing time that might not be available. There's also the problem of trying to fit a trio of talented freshmen -- power forward Ed Davis, point guard Larry Drew Jr. and center Tyler Zeller -- into an already overcrowded rotation.
The last time UNC was faced with such a situation, in 1994, the combination proved toxic. The four returning starters from the previous year's national championship team never got along with newcomers Rasheed Wallace and Jerry Stackhouse and the Tar Heels never came close to reaching their potential. When they lost to Boston College in the second round of the NCAA tournament, the players seemed more relieved than upset. They couldn't wait for the season to be over.
While that's not as likely to happen with this group, in large measure, because of the personalities of the players involved, it's still a possibility. Coach Roy Williams is going to realize the threat and take whatever measures necessary to keep his team from becoming fractured. That means doing more than just rolling the ball out and letting the most talented players in the nation do their thing.
But worrying about that now is like putting your Christmas toys away without playing with them for fear that they might get broken. It is, after all, better to have too much talent than not enough. When you're given an unexpected gift, as the Tar Heels and their fans were Monday, you don't question your good fortune. You simply thank your lucky stars and enjoy it for as long as it lasts.
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
The other difference between the 1994 team and this one, is that Rasheed and Stackhouse were better than the returning players.
These freshmen are awesome, but I hope Larry Drew doesn't think he should start ahead of Ty Lawson.
Brett- heard you on the radio, glad you're still gonna blog!
Lawson wanted to go top 20 and didn't want to risk dropping to second round, therefore pulled out.
Ellington wanted 1st round and had no promises, makes sense to return.
Green wanted to see if he could earn a 'guarantee' from a team, didn't happen, coming back for a title/exposure/more dancin.
I'd love for us to go 40-0 or whatever but really, I just hope we don't choke like the last team to have 8 Mc'Donalds All-Americans on the roster. I can take getting beat by a better team (Kansas). Losses like Georgetown '07 are hard to stomach... However, there's nothing worse than a Murray State, VCU, or Puerto Rico loss for your program.
If there's one thing we've learned from sports (esp.in the last couple years) is that 'any given Sunday' is true, even if it ain't the NFL.
on that note,
Good luck Team USA basketball (despite K) !
looking forward to some more good ole fashion light-hearted banter Brett, take care!
Thank you Matt and bobcat. I can't tell you how glad it is that you found me and you're posting. Now that I know somebody is reading it, I promise I will do a better job of keeping up this blog. You can also help me by writing an email or calling the Observer telling them how much you miss me and would like to see me back. This has been -- and is going to continue to be -- a very difficult time for my family and I and I appreciate all the support I can get.
Now, back to the subject at hand ...
Matt, you make a valid point. Rasheed and Stack were probably two of the top five recruits in the nation that year and were clearly better than the guys who were starting in front of them. And Dean didn't help the situation by insisting on starting the seniors over the more talented freshmen. I don't think Roy would do that. Having said that, he's still going to have chemistry issues to deal with this season.
As for going 40-0, bobcat, nothing is impossible. There's a lot of luck and other variables involved in an unbeaten season -- like an injury to Lawson or Hansbrough -- but if any team in recent memory has the potential to pull it off, it's these Tar Heels.
Regarding your comments on the radio about retired jerseys--what do you think is are the appropriate criteria for jersey retirement? Do you think the criteria should be different for a school with multiple national championships and a school that's never even won a conference championship?
Just interested...
Roger, I think it's a subjective thing and as such, each school or franchise should set it's own standards and criteria.
I just think that it should be a very special, very exclusive honor that should be reserved for the truly special players -- and winning a national Player of the Year award doesn't necessarily make one that kind of player.
What are your thoughts on the subject?
Post a Comment